Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
Mustang1964s
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:48 pm
First Name: Steve
Last Name: Bourgeois
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914, 1926
Location: Waco, TX
MTFCA Number: 29784
MTFCI Number: 22970
Board Member Since: 2007

Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by Mustang1964s » Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:47 pm

I was talking to a neighbor about his T.
He would like to go a Z head, because the RAJO is way to many horses and has to keep the top oiled.
He is saying that he would need a to replace the block as well.
I was thinking that he should be able to pull the head put valves back in and should be pretty much good to go.

The only way to determine who is right is to pull the head and that is slated for this winter.

I have not seen a RAJO head off the block, but is only makes sense that it is a bolt on option.
Or is there some machines work that has to be done to the block?

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 5339
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Many
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by Henry K. Lee » Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:22 pm

That's pretty much it in a nut shell.., bolt on performance, But.., some bored out the valve guides or did no repairs to valve seats during a rebuild then installed the over head valve option. Pandora's Box!

Hank

User avatar

Mark Chaffin
Posts: 3327
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 12:11 pm
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Chaffin
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 Speedster, 1927 Lake Roadster
Location: Lake Elsinore
MTFCA Number: 31705
Board Member Since: 2001

Re: Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by Mark Chaffin » Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:29 pm

The valve guides may have been drilled out to accept the pushrods. When installing our head, we recommend they be drilled out to 7/16 to allow the use of our 5/16 pushrods. The 7/16 clearance is necessary as the pushrod moves from side to side during operation. The block can be changed back to the use of stock valves if 7/16 OD sleeves are installed with an ID of 11/32. Hope the helps answer you question.


Dan McEachern
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:08 am
First Name: DAN
Last Name: MCEACHERN
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: too many. '14 touring, 2 depot hacks, 2 speedsters
Location: ALAMEDA,CA,USA

Re: Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by Dan McEachern » Fri Aug 07, 2020 12:58 am

That's why stock Rajo pushrods are 1/4" diameter. Same with stock Frontenac. Your friend will just need to pull the head and see what condition the block is in and then make a decision. Trashed valve seats or enlarged guide bores would require the block to be removed from the car, unless you have the ability to do any repair work with the block in place. It could be done by the right person but would most likely be beyond the average model T owner.


JSteele
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:25 am
First Name: John P.
Last Name: Steele
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Roadster
Location: Montana
MTFCA Number: 374
MTFCA Life Member: YES
MTFCI Number: 137

Re: Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by JSteele » Sat Aug 08, 2020 5:58 pm

Smith Brothers makes 1/4 " pushrods to your length specifications. They run $12-$15 a piece. I'm sure there are others that make them.
If your building a hot rod you may want to put some thought into an engine. If your looking for more power going up hills and to help with general driving I would think 1/4 fine. I have a set in a RAJO set up and there hasn't been any problems. Yes you have keep your top end oiled, but I haven't found that to be the end of the world. If it's a Model 30 or 35 and you have an original manifold it should all be pretty simple. Get an OHV head gasket. If you have one of the B's you will have to move your exhaust system. I think in the day this was considered pretty much a bolt on deal unless you were building a race car.

User avatar

Susanne
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:06 pm
First Name: Susanne
Last Name: Rohner
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Late '15 touring, "Angel".
Location: Valfabbrica, (central) Italy
MTFCA Number: 464
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 1999
Contact:

Re: Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by Susanne » Sat Aug 08, 2020 8:13 pm

Also remember as you're building your "fast" motor, the top end is only the beginning. Once you're developing more compression via breathing and flow, you're getting more dynamic force onto the lower end... Of course, the first thought is usually the bearings, but it actually goes deeper than that, and the deeper down the rabbit hole you go the more you're dug in... Some of the things to think about are oil (specifically pressure oil), Cranks better than the "bent paper clip" Ford gave you, Journal size, Rods, more bearings, cooling, pistons... Then there's carburetion, brakes, gearing...

It's a rabbit hole. You can do amazing things to a T engine, but you need the base to build it on. WIthout that you'll have a very fast motor that will shuck it's mortal coil similarly fast, in a rather sad and depressing manner. And the way these heads (Rajo BB, Fronty SR, et al) breathe you have the potential of overrunning your motor unless you give consideration to the motor as an entire system. Add a large Stromberg or Winfield carb to the mix, and whoo doggie yee haw!!!

BTW - measured all my pushrods, and the ones on both the BB and the SR are 0.249-0.250 and change... (I have them separated out by diameters...)

I have a question, however... what are people's practical thoughts on studs, washers, and nuts for either of the aforementioned heads? Figure studs would be a more stout and secure way to adhere the parts together than bolts, but up in the air about what others are running...


Dan McEachern
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:08 am
First Name: DAN
Last Name: MCEACHERN
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: too many. '14 touring, 2 depot hacks, 2 speedsters
Location: ALAMEDA,CA,USA

Re: Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by Dan McEachern » Sat Aug 08, 2020 10:22 pm

Studs are always a step up from bolts, but depending on the firewall situation on a particular body/ firewall, and the need for the extra height to pull a head with studs in the block, it can be an issue. Removing the firewall/body in order to remove the head can be a major PITA.

User avatar

AndyClary
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:15 am
First Name: Andrew
Last Name: Clary
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Runabout 1926 Coupe. Mercury Speedster #1249
Location: Usa
MTFCA Number: 24057

Re: Settle a dispute about RAJO heads

Post by AndyClary » Sun Aug 09, 2020 9:12 am

Downgrading from a Rajo to a z head is going to be disappointing. Like to see as much speed equipment as possible being used. Who wants to have the fastest shelf.

Andy

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic