Page 1 of 1

Crankshaft Belt Pulley

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2020 6:10 pm
by ModelTWoods
Has anyone ever had their crankshaft belt pulley, powder-coated? Would the powder coating make the pulley so slick, it would be impossible for the belt to grip the pulley? Asking before I send some parts to my powder-coater.

Re: Crankshaft Belt Pulley

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2020 7:41 pm
by Rich Bingham
Why ?? It wouldn't be sensible to paint it. There's no need. Just MHO.

Re: Crankshaft Belt Pulley

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2020 7:47 pm
by big2bird
Go ahead. The belt will eat it off anyhow in 20 miles.

Re: Crankshaft Belt Pulley

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 9:15 am
by Adam
It was a well known fact (back in the day) that you never paint the contact surface of a belt pulley because the belt won’t grip.

Powder-coat will NEVER wear off unless it is of extremely poor quality.

Re: Crankshaft Belt Pulley

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:21 am
by big2bird
Adam wrote:
Fri Nov 13, 2020 9:15 am
It was a well known fact (back in the day) that you never paint the contact surface of a belt pulley because the belt won’t grip.

Powder-coat will NEVER wear off unless it is of extremely poor quality.
You may be correct about wear, but it works fine.
This pulley has more time than any T will ever see, and grips fine in a race motor.
16052808462634074669181441927997.jpg

Re: Crankshaft Belt Pulley

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:31 pm
by Kerry
You can't get the same tension on a T belt as a modern race engine. The fan bushing wouldn't last 5 minutes, clean steel slips enough with a bit of oil around let alone the slippery surface of 2 pack paint added as well, it's why race engines paint glyptol in side an engine, to have a frictionless surface. I wouldn't be painting it.

Re: Crankshaft Belt Pulley

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 4:07 pm
by big2bird
The coeffecient of friction of bare steel on leather vs powder coat and leather is virtually the same.
.5-.6.
I am fully aware of T requirements.
A rubber impregnated belt is slightly improved.