MTFCA Forum

https://gdyatian.en.made-in-china.com/p ... w-Car.html

I won't even explain anything, the title says enough...

Cool looking golf cart.
Stupid place for a spare tire.

If it is "street legal" it would be cool to own and drive one.

You could drive it all over Catalina Island.

Who must not wish for noble style of golfist device? Metal tub for purest luxury with rubber tire and cushion of comfort like cowhide! Will also go one way or another for perfect mastery of sand trap or water bog! Will stop when your command! State quantity desire and order quickly before supply disappears at any moment! Stay in tune for exciting release of ultimate three wheel golfist motorcar in exact shape of famous Elvis Presley guitar! Be the first part of this new upheaval of style and tradition!

That photo of it in the container looks a lot like the photos of Ts shipped in crates back in the day.

It should be noted that the Chinese claim NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRADEMARKS OR LICENSING.
Also, you can't file a lawsuit in China unless you are a Chinese citizen, so only a lawsuit by a Chinese citizen can proceed. All others are dismissed.
If they get a letter from FMC, they will laugh and throw it away.

Just wait until we have people who buy one of these, um, "things" and decide it's a real T...

More junk from china, I will stick with Henry's.

Discussed before; $6,600.00 - $7,250.00 in 2018 The company also makes golf carts and what you might call shuttle cars. State & Local Municipalities laws vary on if and where golf carts can be used
http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/82 ... 1516737879

I saw many of these in Vienna Austria two years ago used for taxi or shuttle service.

I like it but will not purchase one. I don't play golf and I also suspect that getting parts would be a nightmare.
The Chinese manufacturer used the Ford name in the advertisement, but I doubt that Ford can do much unless somebody from the USA buys one. I think that Ford could require that the U S purchaser buy a license. I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think that a person can knowingly buy a product that is sold under an existing corporation's brand without the permission of the trademark's owner.