Carburetor / Intake Question

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
Mark Osterman
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:18 pm
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Osterman
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 runabout
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:

Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by Mark Osterman » Wed Oct 20, 2021 4:16 pm

Received a nice original offset Master intake manifold for the Master Carburetor I found at Hershey. It’s clear the manifold is for model T by the two inlet openings and the clamp bosses. But … the throat opening is just slightly smaller than the carburetor throat opening. The difference looks like 3/32. A little file work would make the two fit.

Should I use this manifold or keep searching? What would be the result in performance by using a manifold with slightly smaller opening?
Attachments
65CB8195-97D4-493B-8EF7-E1E5195A03B3.jpeg


Scott_Conger
Posts: 6420
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13, '15, '19, '23
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by Scott_Conger » Wed Oct 20, 2021 4:21 pm

Mark, I suspect that you already know the answer to that...

In my opinion, taking a file to either would be like improving the Mona Lisa with a magic marker

BTW, I am certain that you'd never feel the difference before/after filing. You might detect a slight difference with emissions testing equipment, but not via the seat of your pants.

Take a look here for a lot of useful information: https://modeltfordfix.com/the-miller-ma ... el-t-ford/
Scott Conger

Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny

NH Full Flow Float Valves
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured


Topic author
Mark Osterman
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:18 pm
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Osterman
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 runabout
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by Mark Osterman » Wed Oct 20, 2021 7:39 pm

Actually I don’t. I guess the question then is if it reduces the beneficial effect of that carburetor .. would it still be an improvement over a stock carburetor. Royce had a nice article on rebuilding and running one of these in his T. But I’m guessing it had the exact fit for carburetor to manifold.

The flange on this manifold also has an air valve installed and was slot cut to make removing / installing easier.

Is your reluctance to grinding the opening based on the rarity of the manifold? My assumption was that the transition from carb to manifold should be a smooth transition.
Attachments
E1C5A78E-22A7-45F1-9E1D-97C61ACCF8F1.jpeg


Scott_Conger
Posts: 6420
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13, '15, '19, '23
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by Scott_Conger » Wed Oct 20, 2021 8:43 pm

It would likely still be a huge improvement as-is, so long as the car can be started relatively easily.

efficient carburetion is a combination of a number of things, not just a minor sharp constriction ( the blending of which, will have minimal impact).

Airflow is dependent on the valve area and swept volume of the engine...it will not be modified to any sufficient degree that can be undone by simply blending the intake orifice. All you are looking for is for the fuel to remain atomized within the intake manifold and no blending will improve over what you have.

An example of the un-obvious is the manifold for the Zenith S4BF. The port area which mounts to the engine is suddenly and dramatically reduced to create a (second) venturi effect, which when removed by hapless hobbiests (seeking to improve air flow) vastly reduces the effectivity of the carb. Another example of unintended consequences, if you do an MTFCA search, is the frequent reduction in performance when "high flow" manifolds are installed without an increase in valve lift or diameter.

In carburetion, things don't always work out the way you expect. At the very least, I would try it as-is. You may find that the carb you have is in fact for a larger displacement engine and is hard starting (if the venturi is too large).

with respect to filing/blending, my personal view is that either part of your setup is quite rare and desirable on their own and it would be a shame to unnecessarily alter it without even being certain you 1. have a problem, or 2. that blending would solve an as-yet unmanifested problem.

the fact that the manifold is not matched to the carb size, but is from your description a match for a Model T, I very much suspect that while the carb may really perform, it might be hard starting and is likely for a larger motor...if that is the case, altering the manifold will not solve the problem.
Scott Conger

Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny

NH Full Flow Float Valves
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured


Topic author
Mark Osterman
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:18 pm
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Osterman
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 runabout
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by Mark Osterman » Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:09 pm

Thanks Scott for this information. It’s clear that the slight opening increase suggests this carburetor was made for a larger engine. I’m amazed that around 1/16 would make such a difference. I guess I’ll try to install it as is and give it a try. May have to use smaller bolts with nuts rather than bolts that fit the threaded holes in the carburetor flange.


Scott_Conger
Posts: 6420
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13, '15, '19, '23
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by Scott_Conger » Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:17 pm

Hopefully everything will work out. At the very least, you have found yourself a true work of art and a rare one at that. They are exceptionally well made, were really expensive when new, and had remarkably advanced engineering for its time. It was the touch-stone of carbs of its day.
Scott Conger

Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny

NH Full Flow Float Valves
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured


kmatt2
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:41 pm
First Name: Kevin
Last Name: Matthiesen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 T Coupe, 16 T Open Express, 21 TT Flatbed. 15 T Roadster, 13 & 25 T Speedster , 51 Mercury 4 door sport sedan, 67 Mercury Cougar
Location: Madera CA 93636
MTFCA Number: 11598

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by kmatt2 » Wed Oct 20, 2021 10:06 pm

The 3/32 inch difference in less diameter of manifold is probably equal to the diameter of the carburetor barrel and should not be a problem. Make sure that the carburetor throat and manifold mount concentrate and not offset. This is probably why the one manifold mount hole was elongated for some other carburetor. I would not do any file work to the manifold.


J1MGOLDEN
Posts: 938
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:39 pm
First Name: James
Last Name: Golden
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Roadster
Location: Bowie, MD
MTFCA Number: 14294
MTFCI Number: 13562

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by J1MGOLDEN » Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:02 pm

That is one weird early carb if nothing else.

Has anyone ever seen one of them before?


Scott_Conger
Posts: 6420
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13, '15, '19, '23
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Carburetor / Intake Question

Post by Scott_Conger » Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:36 pm

yup........
Scott Conger

Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny

NH Full Flow Float Valves
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic