1913 KW Coil Box ...latest install date??
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 424
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:21 am
- First Name: Brent
- Last Name: Terry
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 Tourabout, 1914 Runabout, 1915 Touring, 1916 Speedster, 1925 Speedster, 1926 Hack
- Location: Eastern Tennessee
- Board Member Since: 1999
- Contact:
1913 KW Coil Box ...latest install date??
Is it possible that a 1913 KW wooden coil would/could have been installed on a Feb 1914 build??
-
- Posts: 6262
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:56 pm
- First Name: Frank
- Last Name: Brandi
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Speedsters (1919 w 1926 upgrades), 1926 (Ricardo Head)
- Location: Moline IL
- Board Member Since: 2018
Re: 1913 KW Coil Box ...latest install date??
There are always discussions on "consumption" of inventory, so anything is possible. I found this interesting, so the questions is do you have a 1913 or 1914? You can't always rely on the Title and/or engine #BRENT in 10-uh-C wrote: ↑Fri Apr 08, 2022 3:04 pmIs it possible that a 1913 KW wooden coil would/could have been installed on a Feb 1914 build??
The past is a great place and I don't want to erase it or to regret it, but I don't want to be its prisoner either.
Mick Jagger
Mick Jagger
-
- Posts: 3699
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:43 am
- First Name: Larry
- Last Name: Smith
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 13 Touring, 13 Roadster, 17 Coupelet, 25 Roadster P/U
- Location: Lomita, California
- MTFCA Life Member: YES
Re: 1913 KW Coil Box ...latest install date??
To my knowledge, the K.W. coilbox used in 1913, along with two others, began to be replaced by the new style Ford coilbox in July of 1913, so it seems unlikely it would would have been carried into the 1914 model year.
-
- Posts: 3699
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:43 am
- First Name: Larry
- Last Name: Smith
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 13 Touring, 13 Roadster, 17 Coupelet, 25 Roadster P/U
- Location: Lomita, California
- MTFCA Life Member: YES
Re: 1913 KW Coil Box ...latest install date??
Neither the current MTFCI judging guidelines, or Bruce's book mention when the change occurred, so I'll stick with my comment above. The K.W. box was only used in 1913, and is a very reliable coilbox. The reason I started using them is because of the points. Back when I restored my touring in the early 1960's you couldn't find Heinze or Kinston points. Randall Anderson came along and solved that problem. Lang's bought out most of Randall's stuff, so hopefully they will continue the operation.
-
Topic author - Posts: 424
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:21 am
- First Name: Brent
- Last Name: Terry
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 Tourabout, 1914 Runabout, 1915 Touring, 1916 Speedster, 1925 Speedster, 1926 Hack
- Location: Eastern Tennessee
- Board Member Since: 1999
- Contact:
Re: 1913 KW Coil Box ...latest install date??
Thanks Larry. With the Benson Research Center still closed, I am unable to go do research for other projects and look this info up too.Original Smith wrote: ↑Fri Apr 08, 2022 4:18 pmTo my knowledge, the K.W. coilbox used in 1913, along with two others, began to be replaced by the new style Ford coilbox in July of 1913, so it seems unlikely it would would have been carried into the 1914 model year.
So you mentioned the July of 1913 date of when the metal-type coil box being introduced. I am assuming this date is coming from the Assembly drawing itself? If so, do you have an EI number that corresponds to the print that might give direction on final PO's being given to K.W. for building those boxes, -or maybe the info on the EI gave direction where all remaining inventory that was in stock was to be diverted to Depots for distribution after a certain date instead of to the Branches for installation? If nothing is mentioned, then it would be assumed by me that existing orders on POs and the shipped inventory from those orders would be slated for installation and then used up first?