Speedster Questions

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
35mike
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:28 am
First Name: Mike
Last Name: Russell
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1922 Pickup Express Wood Body, 1926 Runabout
Location: Columbia MO

Speedster Questions

Post by 35mike » Fri May 03, 2019 2:01 pm

Are there any tie rod or drag link issues when using a dropped front axle?
Will an 8 leaf front spring will be suitable?
I will be using a T engine, 'A' crank, Fronty head. I forget the model, but not exotic. This setup should be a little heavier than a stock T engine.
What are the simple methods for dropping the rear to match the front? Z-ing the frame, Brackets?
If I Z the frame, do I add channel to maintain stock wheelbase or shorten driveshaft, etc?

I'm just getting started and thought some input from folks who have "been there, done that" might save me some pain and suffering.
Thanks .

Mike Russell
Missouri

User avatar

babychadwick
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Boattail speedster, 1912 Tourabout project, 1927 Speedster (build)
Location: Henderson, TN
Board Member Since: 1999
Contact:

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by babychadwick » Fri May 03, 2019 4:16 pm

I would recommend changing out to a different steering box and not retaining the stock T steering. Dropping the rear can be done a few different ways and some can work with certain body styles and not with others. Having said this here's what I did. The front can be much easier to dial in than the rear as you can play with it up and down depending on those little bits (later spring, later spindles, chevy spindles, inverted eye etc) where you can gain or lose a half inch-inch. I opted for a rear Z but not massive making up the rest of the drop with a "bent" spring. On the front I used similar to a laurel bracket but allowing for a 4 link setup. The drop in the rear is "set" so as its assembled and weighted down I will be able to play with the front to bring it up or down so it all lays right without looking like a massive drop.
Attachments
IMG_20181110_162146271.jpg
"Those who fail to plan, plan to fail"

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 5339
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Many
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by Henry K. Lee » Fri May 03, 2019 5:21 pm

Mike,

A lot has to do with year Model,ie, brass era, low radiator, high radiator, and seat position with windshield.

There are so many variables in Speedsters. Number one is making it safe with the modifications. Steering geometry when lowering or raking the front will be your first obstacle but not difficult. 8 leaves is not necessary 7 should work well depending on the condition of the spring.

I would set ride height first with an extra 1 1/2” in the rear. Be careful about going to low as the flywheel area of the pan can get a nasty hit. Normally, a 5/6” drop makes for a nice ride.

Hope this helps you some, All the Best,

Hank


Topic author
35mike
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:28 am
First Name: Mike
Last Name: Russell
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1922 Pickup Express Wood Body, 1926 Runabout
Location: Columbia MO

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by 35mike » Fri May 03, 2019 6:25 pm

Thanks guys for the good info.The reason I mentioned the 8 leaf front spring is because I have a couple of them (NOS or NORS) and I thought I might as well use one if it is suitable. Spindles are easy enough to get so I can use them to fine tune the stance when the rear is done.
I would like to keep the car as low as is practical because my hope is to fit it with hand controls so my Son can drive it. He will have to transfer from his wheelchair, so lower is better. I'm also thinking of a seat with tricks to make things easier.
I have a Ruckstell and a Warford but it seems like he will have plenty to do with his hands already without the additional duties, not to mention the added clutter.
I'll be back. Thanks again.

Mike


Wayne Sheldon
Posts: 3678
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:13 pm
First Name: Wayne
Last Name: Sheldon
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Runabout 1913 Speedster
Location: Grass Valley California, USA
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by Wayne Sheldon » Fri May 03, 2019 7:15 pm

A Ruckstell could be fine with all hand controls. Many model T people routinely shift the Ruckstell without using the clutch anyway. The Ruckstell should be in excellent condition for safety reasons. I would NOT recommend any of the common auxiliary transmissions (Warford, Muncie, etc) as they are prone to missed shifts issues that could become very dangerous very quickly without more than two hands to work levers.
The throttle can be altered to work from either side of the steering wheel. There were actually accessories made back in the day to do that. The Ruckstell shift lever can be used either in the center as originally set up, or moved to the driver's left as many people today prefer it. Access in and out of the car may be your best deciding factor there.
Good luck, and have fun!

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 5339
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Many
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by Henry K. Lee » Fri May 03, 2019 7:30 pm

Mike,

If you require assistance in making the car user friendly for your son, please feel free to contact me and will assist in the designs to make it easier for either of you.

Not ever getting in another’s business, but some are more blessed than others and anyone in your situation, I will accommodate for smiles.

All the Best,

Hank in Tin-A-See


Topic author
35mike
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:28 am
First Name: Mike
Last Name: Russell
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1922 Pickup Express Wood Body, 1926 Runabout
Location: Columbia MO

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by 35mike » Sat May 04, 2019 9:58 am

Thanks, Hank and Wayne, for the input. Good thoughts on the Ruckstell. It can always be added at later time if everything else goes well.
I have some levers, given to me several years ago, that were for making a T driveable for a one legged driver. I think a T can be driven with one leg without any modifications. The levers are interesting, none the less, and I will check them out to see if they will be helpful. The existing lever is good for braking and allowing high gear. If low gear could somehow be added to it, then reverse gear would be the remaining hurdle.
With good brakes at the rear wheels, the transmission brake could be ignored, right?

Mike

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 5339
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Many
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by Henry K. Lee » Sat May 04, 2019 10:40 am

Mike,

All the levers could be positioned to the right of the driver using a trapeze method except for reverse. The reverse could be to the left. High and low would work from the same mechanism.

All the Best,

Hank

PS Quit sweating the small stuff man, we have been to the moon! LOL!

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 5339
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Many
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by Henry K. Lee » Sat May 04, 2019 10:40 am

Mike,

All the levers could be positioned to the right of the driver using a trapeze method except for reverse. The reverse could be to the left. High and low would work from the same mechanism.

All the Best,

Hank

PS Quit sweating the small stuff man, we have been to the moon! LOL!


TeveS-Nor Cal
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:11 pm
First Name: Steve
Last Name: Straw
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 and lots of parts
Location: Penn Valley, CA
MTFCA Number: 12542

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by TeveS-Nor Cal » Sat May 04, 2019 3:47 pm

Another factor in this lowering problem is that the torque tube should never go beyond level- even on the biggest bump with your other-in-law riding with you. This is very bad for the universal joint! As I remember this gives you about 7" to play with. I have found that 7" is normally enough!


Les Schubert
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:47 pm
First Name: Les
Last Name: Schubert
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 27 roadster 13 touring
Location: Calgary

Re: Speedster Questions

Post by Les Schubert » Sat May 04, 2019 9:13 pm

For what it’s worth, it is not too difficult to put a automatic transmission behind a T block. I have cast a aluminum adapter

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic