Page 1 of 1

Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:36 am
by Dollisdad
IMG_0950.jpeg
IMG_0935.jpeg
IMG_0939.jpeg
IMG_0938.jpeg

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:37 am
by Dollisdad
IMG_0952.jpeg
IMG_0940.jpeg
IMG_0943.jpeg
IMG_0955.jpeg

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:39 am
by Dollisdad
IMG_0945.jpeg
IMG_0949.jpeg
IMG_0946.jpeg
IMG_0947.jpeg

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:40 am
by Dollisdad
IMG_0934.jpeg
IMG_0951.jpeg
IMG_0957.jpeg
IMG_0960.jpeg

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:09 pm
by RajoRacer
Just a point of observation: it seems as though in most all of the photos Tom has posted where the bulb horn is visible, some pre '13 cars appear to be mounted "bell up" on the horns whereas most '13 & later appear to be "bell down" ????????????????????

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:11 pm
by Erik Johnson
Third photo - rare 1917 coupelet with aftermarket wheels.

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:41 pm
by George House
6th from the bottom: is that Model S a wide track ? If so, it’d be the first I’ve seen…

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:41 pm
by martinola
George House wrote:
Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:41 pm
6th from the bottom: is that Model S a wide track ? If so, it’d be the first I’ve seen…
I'm not saying it isn't a wide track, but there looks like there is a lot of wide angle lens distortion - note the curvature in the background.

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 4:05 pm
by Erik Johnson
The photo of the Model S is distorted because the original photo was not scanned on a flatbed scanner or it was copied with a camera and the lens not perfectedly parallel to the original photo.

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 4:29 pm
by TRDxB2
Erik Johnson wrote:
Tue Jan 21, 2025 4:05 pm
The photo of the Model S is distorted because the original photo was not scanned on a flatbed scanner or it was copied with a camera and the lens not perfectedly parallel to the original photo.
Used Paint to round the headlights. The tops of the telephone polls & background still looks a bit odd

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:08 pm
by RajoRacer
Man, does she have some "Big Hair" or what ?

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:30 am
by Drkbp
Crooksville Auto Garage building has survived.
300 East Main Street, Crooksville, Ohio

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:54 pm
by WayneJ
I believe the lady in question is wearing a hat.

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 1:30 pm
by Randy SR
From the post title I expected to see pictures from Washington DC........

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 4:11 pm
by Original Smith
There are a lot of 13-14 owners, who have failed to look at original photos of 13-14 Fords.

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2025 4:33 pm
by George House
Whats your point Larry ? In this series of photos is represented the left side of three 1913s and one 1914 and all the horn bells were assembled “bell down”. Isn’t that universally accepted ?

Re: Crooksville.

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:03 am
by Wayne Sheldon
Unfortunately, not universally accepted.

I understand where Larry is coming from. As one who has most certainly closely examined more era photos of the first half of the 20th century than have 99 percent of the educated people of the world, and I have closely examined literally tens of thousands of era photos of model T Fords. I have seen too many restorations done wrong on simple details that could have been easily researched. I have seen many 1913 and 1914 model T Fords with their horns mounted upside down. What is right and what is wrong has been debated for many decades, with the whole "bell up" and "bell down" thing confusing everyone that expects a simple "one size fits all" answer. The fact IS that bulb type horns were used for nearly two decades on automobiles and manufactured in literally hundreds of models and sizes. Many, actually far and away MOST, had some type of twist to the horn (which amplifies the sounds created by the reed vibrations) in order to maintain a practical size. By twisting or rolling the nearly two to as much as four foot long bell/horn it became an easy to place six to eight inch size.
Horn "twists" could be "right hand" or "left hand" twist, and the choice altered where and how the mounting bracket might fit the - - - whatever it was mounted onto, as well as how the longer horn tubes needed to be routed due to offsets in the connector. And, of course, everything was further complicated by the fact that a lot of cars were right hand side driven unlike the model TS of the USA. And some cars were sold without horns or people wanted something different or a replacement for a damaged horn providing manufacturers with countless opportunities to sell after-market horns.
The 1913 and 1914 model T Ford horns were one of the most common style ever in production, manufactured by several different companies! And guess what? They were manufactured in both right hand and left hand twist versions (not even taking into account the Canadian right hand drive cars!). The model T replacement was common and cheap, and a lot of people did not notice or care about the direction of twist.

The simple fact is that a lot of people restoring 1913/'14 model Ts put them on the wrong way. A lot of people wind up with Ford looking horns that are twisted the wrong way? But they make them fit and work. And a lot of people have correct Ford horns, but they manage to mount them upside down and still work.

Now, about those era photographs. I know that over the years, I have seen a few era photos showing 1913 or 1914 model T Fords, clearly showing the horn what we consider to be upside down. To further confuse the issue, many horns on earlier model Ts were in fact mounted "bell up" in such a way that the if water were to be splashed into the bell, the water would right on down into the coiled horn tube. Many other cars of the era did also mount their horns that way. As far as the industry was concerned at that time? I seriously doubt they spent much time debating the right or wrong of it.
Although I have seen many 1912 model Ts with the horns "bell up", actually, with the horn tubing run outside the body, "bell up" actually made it simpler to put the tubing down low enough to be out of the way. By 1913, Ford put the tubing inside the body, necessitating the tubing being above the floor, and with a fake door, lots of place for the tubing to go. 1912 had a wider variety of body styles, some with different horns, as well as changes in the horn through the year. For 1913 (and on through 1914 and into the early 1915s), for basically the first time, Ford basically standardized the horn and it's placement on all cars.

However, earlier today, I decided to take a few minutes, and take a quick run through some of the era photos on my computer. To be clear, it was about 150 era photos of 1913s, and I lost count around 200 era photos of 1914s. Out of all those, I did not find a single 1913 with the horn "upside down"! I did find one 1914 T stuck in high water, ironically trying to show why the horn should be mounted so that the water doesn't enter the bell and run down into the coiled tube.
1914Fordingtheriver.jpg