Ford Motor Co. Board of Dir. (BOD) excerpts of minutes; food for thought

For all the models before the Model T
User avatar

Topic author
Rob
Posts: 1536
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 1:53 pm
First Name: Rob
Last Name: Heyen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Models B, F, K, N, Ford racer and 3 Model T
Location: Eastern Nebraska

Ford Motor Co. Board of Dir. (BOD) excerpts of minutes; food for thought

Post by Rob » Fri Jun 13, 2025 9:06 am

Attached are excerpts from the Ford Motor Co. (FMC) Board of Directors (BOD) minutes between April 2, 1904 and May 16, 1905. We see in April 1904, while less than one year since incorporation (June 1903), FMC is taking bids for wheels on their next model (Model B was addressed in earlier meetings).
IMG_8057.jpeg
At the August 22, 1904 meeting, actual production numbers are addressed. Initially, A.Y. Malcomson puts forward a motion for 2,500 “small cars” (C & F). This is an interesting moment, in my opinion, in FMC history. Malcomson’s motion not only fails, it receives no second. For me, this indicates a lack of support by other board members, (as opposed to historical views that Malcomson held sway over a majority or significant number on the BOD). It also indicates Malcomson’s desire, and/or recognition that the “small cars” were important to the success of FMC (keeping in mind, Model B has already been initially addressed). Bottom line, Malcomson wanted the company to produce more less expensive cars, at this point, than the other directors thought prudent.

Fast forward to May 16, 1905. We see the BOD is compelled, by agent request, to reduce the cost of the 2 cyl. cars by about 20%. No issue is raised regarding the larger Model B cost to agents.


KeithG
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:00 pm
First Name: Keith
Last Name: Gumbinger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '14 Touring, '26 RPU, '27 Fordor, '27 Touring
Location: Kenosha, WI
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 1999

Re: Ford Motor Co. Board of Dir. (BOD) excerpts of minutes; food for thought

Post by KeithG » Fri Jun 13, 2025 2:26 pm

Rob, At the August 22, 1904 BOD meeting when Malcomson moved that an order be placed with Dodge Brothers for 2,500 small cars and that motion didn't even receive a second, even though "there were historical views that Malcomson was considered to have sway over a majority or significant number of BOD members". Do you suppose that Malcomson was pushing for more small Ford cars because he was already thinking about his own car company in the future even though it would not get started until the Fall of 1905? Could Malcomson be thinking that small car sales would begin to fall and larger cars would be more successful, like the ones he would build in the near future?

Your thoughts?

Keith
'14 Touring, '26 Roadster Pickup, '27 Fordor, '27 Touring
Motto: It's hard to build a garage that's tooooo big! :D

User avatar

Topic author
Rob
Posts: 1536
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 1:53 pm
First Name: Rob
Last Name: Heyen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Models B, F, K, N, Ford racer and 3 Model T
Location: Eastern Nebraska

Re: Ford Motor Co. Board of Dir. (BOD) excerpts of minutes; food for thought

Post by Rob » Fri Jun 13, 2025 9:40 pm

Keith,
Good points. It’s difficult to speculate. Up to this time (mid 1905) there didn’t appear to be any daylight between the Ford-Malcomson partnership. Things were going well, no, spectacularly. Tomorrow I’m starting a “120 years ago today” thread that will demonstrate how successful Ford Motor Co. had become.

The car Malcomson would produce was neither a “big car” nor well engineered. Ford cars, C, F and B, all were less expensive in their class, and well engineered. My guess is that Malcomson was a speculator, and believed he could do it better than anyone else. His coal and real estate dealings were “feast or famine” endeavors, and it looks like most of his business life he was heavily leveraged. Henry Ford, and James Couzens, on the other hand, were fiscally conservative, sticking to well grounded rules concerning production and marketing. Still, it’s a bit of a mystery. Malcomson wanted to make more small cars. The rest of the board didn’t. The Dodge brothers were both present, and my belief is they knew they would be stretched to capacity. They were now going to be responsible for producing two different motors and chassis. They didn’t add facilities, and we know from Michigan Department of Labor their workforce didn’t grow much between 1904 and 1905. As it turns out, they hurried through Model C chassis production, and by February or March switched over to the F. Model B components were almost all outsourced to other manufacturers. Interesting times.

Thank you for posting.
Cheers,
Rob


KeithG
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:00 pm
First Name: Keith
Last Name: Gumbinger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '14 Touring, '26 RPU, '27 Fordor, '27 Touring
Location: Kenosha, WI
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 1999

Re: Ford Motor Co. Board of Dir. (BOD) excerpts of minutes; food for thought

Post by KeithG » Sat Jun 14, 2025 7:30 pm

Hi Rob, Thanks for the reply. I guess we'll never know for sure. I like the idea that Malcomson was a speculator, and as such goes for feast or famine. In my opinion, should have known better than to compete with Ford.

Cheers, Keith
'14 Touring, '26 Roadster Pickup, '27 Fordor, '27 Touring
Motto: It's hard to build a garage that's tooooo big! :D

User avatar

Topic author
Rob
Posts: 1536
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 1:53 pm
First Name: Rob
Last Name: Heyen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Models B, F, K, N, Ford racer and 3 Model T
Location: Eastern Nebraska

Re: Ford Motor Co. Board of Dir. (BOD) excerpts of minutes; food for thought

Post by Rob » Sat Jun 14, 2025 8:26 pm

Keith,
If you see my next post, as of June and July 1905, one would think the shareholders would have thought “whatever you’re doing, keep it going,” regarding the leadership choices at FMC. However, Malcomson was already preparing to start a competing company, as he sat in a leadership position within FMC.
Hard to understand. Hubris? Wounded ego? Hard to know. Certainly not a good business choice. And over the next year, through July 1906, will see the “Tale of Two Cities,” regarding Henry Ford and A.Y. Malcomson. One will go down in history as one of the greatest industrialists of all time. The other a sad footnote.


OilyBill
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 3:51 pm
First Name: William
Last Name: May
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Runabout
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: Ford Motor Co. Board of Dir. (BOD) excerpts of minutes; food for thought

Post by OilyBill » Thu Aug 07, 2025 12:15 am

Malcomsen's "Aerocar" was pretty much a bust. He was using contracted 4 cylinder air cooled engines made by the Reeves Pulley Company for his Aerocar and when Aerocar shut down, they still had about 700 engines at Reeves that they had not yet paid for. My assumption is the engines were small and underpowered. They were only rated at 20 hp, but I am willing to bet they only put out 15 or so actual horsepower, or even less when hot. You need to be a REALLY GOOD engineer to design an air-cooled engine (Look at Franklin!) and most air cooled engines in other makes suffered from overheating problems. I assume that Malcomsen was operating on VERY thin margins, and it did not take much to push it over the edge into bankruptcy. Franklin had the good engineering required in the form of his chief engineer, John Wilkinson who was an expert at designing air cooled engines. If Malcomson was just buying components and hoping to wind up with a good car, he was definitely surprised when they had a lot of problems.
I found the "Aerocar" factory in Detroit, on Google Maps. The rear of the building still has the "Aerocar" sign painted on it. As far as I know, that is the last trace of the Aerocar existing. Does anyone know where an Aerocar is on display in a museum? I tried finding actual drawings for the engine, but apparently no actual drawings still remain. Reeves Pulley company still exists, but they have nothing.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic