Axle keyhole too wide
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 986
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:16 am
- First Name: Richard
- Last Name: Gould
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1910 touring, 1912 roadster , 1927 roadster
- Location: Folsom, CA
Axle keyhole too wide
I purchased a new rear axle from the supplier in Texas about 7 years ago. It was the axle that is machined the entire length. I needed that feature because it was to be used in a Perfecto. Now that the Perfect is in the car and I am installing the hubs, I see the keyway is too wide. It measures .256". The key measures .248" wide. What do folks do , if anything, to get a better fit. The axle on the other side was recently purchased from Langs and the key is a light press fit requiring tapping with a small hammer to seat.
-
- Posts: 6435
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
- First Name: Scott
- Last Name: Conger
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13, '15, '19, '23
- Location: Clark, WY
- Board Member Since: 2005
Re: Able keyhole too wide
If you are unable to make a key for yourself, call these folks and see what they can do for you regarding an oversize/stepped key: https://www.huyett.com/Products/Power-T ... 201%2F4%22
Scott Conger
Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny
NH Full Flow Float Valves
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured
Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny
NH Full Flow Float Valves
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured
-
- Posts: 5256
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:21 pm
- First Name: Allan
- Last Name: Bennett
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1912 van, 1917 shooting brake, 1929 roadster buckboard, 1924 tourer, 1925 barn find buckboard, 1925 D &F wide body roadster, 1927LHD Tudor sedan.
- Location: Gawler, Australia
Re: Able keyhole too wide
Hayes wire wheels are notorious for flogging out the keyway in the hub. Before I came up with a way to machine them out and replace the centre with a good section from a Ford hub, I had custom made keys milled. We began with 3/8" keystock, milled them to 1/4" on one dimension and then milled the width to that of the hub keyway. Depending on the width of that keyway, that section which fitted into the axle keyway was milled from either side, so the key ended up being a stubby T section.
In your application that stubby T would be upside down, but seeing you only need an extra .006-008" it could be milled on just on side.
Hope this helps.
Allan from down under.
In your application that stubby T would be upside down, but seeing you only need an extra .006-008" it could be milled on just on side.
Hope this helps.
Allan from down under.
-
- Posts: 1414
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:57 am
- First Name: Adam
- Last Name: Doleshal
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘13 Touring, ‘24 Touring, ‘25 TT dump truck, ‘26 Tudor, ‘20 Theiman harvester T powerplant, ‘20 T Staude tractor
- Location: Wisconsin
- MTFCA Number: 23809
- MTFCI Number: 1
- Board Member Since: 2000
Re: Able keyhole too wide
In other bad news, I remember inspecting and rejecting some supposedly “Texas” axle shafts a customer wanted me to install several years ago. They were fully machined from one end to the other, the bearing surfaces were not ground or polished (the lathe turning marks were quite visible), and they were way too soft. A hardness check showed about Rc25 and they should be Rc50. The bearing surfaces were too soft and too rough to be acceptable. My opinion is they likely wouldn’t have lasted very long before the bearing surfaces deteriorated beyond their useable limits. Maybe only a few thousand miles.
-
Topic author - Posts: 986
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:16 am
- First Name: Richard
- Last Name: Gould
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1910 touring, 1912 roadster , 1927 roadster
- Location: Folsom, CA
Re: Axle keyhole too wide
Thanks for the information, fellas. I'll put it to good use. Adam, I hear you loud and clear. I remember the flack about these axels a few years back. I am hoping the one I have will hold up. If not I am looking at a Perfecto tear down and axle replacement. My tooling is not accurate enough to machine a bearing surface for the third axel bearing used on the Perfecto side so I'll have to rely on a third party to do the work. Not an encouraging thought.
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:32 pm
- First Name: George
- Last Name: Mills
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Roadster, 1919 Hack, 1925 Fordor
- Location: Cherry Hill NJ/Anona Largo FL
- MTFCA Number: 29497
- MTFCI Number: 10032
- Board Member Since: 1999
Re: Axle keyhole too wide
I think I'd resort to a custom key at this point. (Anyone ever heard of file-to-fit? Only kidding)
FWIW, back in the day before standards existed the general accepted shop practice was to make a 1/4" key at 1/4 FULL which went on to mean 0.251/0.250 in those companies that stayed in the replacement parts business...
Today that is an oversized key...but not then.
The shaft and arbor in generally acceptable shop practice was to mill at 0.249/0.250...
In the era it WAS an expected metal-to-metal to slight force fit as part of the inherent way to design and manufacture things requiring keys. (If it got dicey as to load expectation and load shock, the general common practice was to go to a gib head key arrangement.)
Oh, and when it came to material for the keystock? A medium carbon steel that would have had a tensile yield of greater than 65,000 psi ( I think this is 1035 or better today?)
Just sharing...if I don't write it down somewhere...someone will have to go and do all of the extensive research into common shop practices in the early 20th century all over again.....
FWIW, back in the day before standards existed the general accepted shop practice was to make a 1/4" key at 1/4 FULL which went on to mean 0.251/0.250 in those companies that stayed in the replacement parts business...
Today that is an oversized key...but not then.
The shaft and arbor in generally acceptable shop practice was to mill at 0.249/0.250...
In the era it WAS an expected metal-to-metal to slight force fit as part of the inherent way to design and manufacture things requiring keys. (If it got dicey as to load expectation and load shock, the general common practice was to go to a gib head key arrangement.)
Oh, and when it came to material for the keystock? A medium carbon steel that would have had a tensile yield of greater than 65,000 psi ( I think this is 1035 or better today?)
Just sharing...if I don't write it down somewhere...someone will have to go and do all of the extensive research into common shop practices in the early 20th century all over again.....