The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 7238
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:37 pm
- First Name: Steve
- Last Name: Jelf
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 touring and a few projects
- Location: Parkerfield, Kansas
- Board Member Since: 2007
- Contact:
The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Well, not really a controversy but a question. When did they start putting the clamps on "backwards"? Maybe somebody who's a better researcher than I am can find some documentation.
The inevitable often happens.
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
-
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:53 am
- First Name: Terry
- Last Name: Woods
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Model T coupe, 1926 4 door sedan
- Location: Cibolo (San Antonio), TX
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Well Steve, I guess you are referring to the 'late' manifold clamps, as the early ones don't have two flat surfaces opposite each other. As for the late clamps, I guess they could be used either way, but with the recessed V, pointed toward the block, they will go on a standard length manifold stud. If they are reversed with the V pointed away from the block, I think a longer manifold stud would be needed. Date of change, I don't know. Maybe sometime in 1925. Maybe T Encyclopedia knows.
-
Topic author - Posts: 7238
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:37 pm
- First Name: Steve
- Last Name: Jelf
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 touring and a few projects
- Location: Parkerfield, Kansas
- Board Member Since: 2007
- Contact:
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Maybe T Encyclopedia knows.
It may be in there, but I didn't find it.
The inevitable often happens.
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:55 pm
- First Name: James
- Last Name: Patrick
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Coupe
- Location: Bartow, FL
- Board Member Since: 2001
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
According to the “Model T Service Manual”, Here is the way it was done in the 1920’s. Jim Patrick
-
- Posts: 6895
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:51 am
- First Name: Richard
- Last Name: Eagle
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 TR 1914 TR 1915 Rd 1920 Spdstr 1922 Coupe 1925 Tudor
- Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
"I think these changed in '24? or '23? Anyone know the cut off date for using the pad type clamps?"
http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/11 ... 1276305342
It may still be up in the air.
Rich
http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/11 ... 1276305342
It may still be up in the air.
Rich
When did I do that?
-
- Posts: 3813
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
- First Name: Dan
- Last Name: Treace
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘12 open express,'23 cutoff, '27 touring
- Location: North Central FL
- Board Member Since: 2000
- Contact:
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
The recessed new style clamp was used beginning with the 1924 model year, which was late in calendar year 1923.
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford
-
- Posts: 6895
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:51 am
- First Name: Richard
- Last Name: Eagle
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 TR 1914 TR 1915 Rd 1920 Spdstr 1922 Coupe 1925 Tudor
- Location: Idaho Falls, ID
-
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
- First Name: Tim
- Last Name: Morsher
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
- Location: Norwalk Ohio
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Another ford better idea! And they saved $$, from a forging to a casting !
-
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
- First Name: Jerry
- Last Name: Van
- Location: S.E. Michigan
-
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
- First Name: Tim
- Last Name: Morsher
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
- Location: Norwalk Ohio
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Jerry, it was just a SWAG guess and a poor one. I’m holding a good late one in my hand it it has ford script and a foundry cartouche, so obviously a forging.
-
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 4:17 pm
- First Name: Mark
- Last Name: Strange
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Cut Off Touring (now a pickup)
- Location: Hillsboro, MO
- Board Member Since: 2013
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
I wonder if the January 1924 engine in Betsy should have the later clamps. It came to me with the longer studs and the older style clamps.
Mark Strange
Hillsboro, MO
1924 Cut-off Touring (now a pickup)
Hillsboro, MO
1924 Cut-off Touring (now a pickup)
-
- Posts: 6609
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:21 pm
- First Name: Allan
- Last Name: Bennett
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1912 van, 1917 shooting brake, 1929 roadster buckboard, 1924 tourer, 1925 barn find buckboard, 1925 D &F wide body roadster, 1927LHD Tudor sedan.
- Location: Gawler, Australia
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Mark, you're worried about the correct manifold clamps and studs and they sit above an alternator.
I don't understand. An alternator is a major departure from originality, so having the correct manifold clamps is hardly going to make the engine bay any more authentic.
Allan from down under.

Allan from down under.
-
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 4:17 pm
- First Name: Mark
- Last Name: Strange
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Cut Off Touring (now a pickup)
- Location: Hillsboro, MO
- Board Member Since: 2013
Re: The manifold clamp controversy rages on.
Guilty as charged! The car came to me with the alternator already installed.
I have a Ron Patterson freshly rebuilt generator and a Regan 6V negative ground voltage regulator on the shelf for the day when the 6V alternator dies.
Trouble is, the alternator refuses to die and it works great, it keeps the battery topped off without boiling the water out of it.
Since my car is already corrupted with an alternator, maybe I should go all in and install a pair of neon green windshield wipers and some fuzzy dice on it as well (that's a joke, son).
I have a Ron Patterson freshly rebuilt generator and a Regan 6V negative ground voltage regulator on the shelf for the day when the 6V alternator dies.
Trouble is, the alternator refuses to die and it works great, it keeps the battery topped off without boiling the water out of it.
Since my car is already corrupted with an alternator, maybe I should go all in and install a pair of neon green windshield wipers and some fuzzy dice on it as well (that's a joke, son).

Mark Strange
Hillsboro, MO
1924 Cut-off Touring (now a pickup)
Hillsboro, MO
1924 Cut-off Touring (now a pickup)