FS accessory spring for early cars

Post parts wanted or for sale here

Topic author
Karl Von Neumann
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:52 am
First Name: Karl
Last Name: VonNeumann
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 touring 1927 tudor 1926 hotrod 1913 speedster (project) 1926 coupe (project)
Location: Pleasant prairie Wisconsin
Board Member Since: 2022

FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by Karl Von Neumann » Mon Aug 25, 2025 11:42 am

No idea on brand on spring is busted and missing 3 caps $80 shipped
Attachments
20250824_155919.jpg
20250824_155932.jpg
Please hold the other 6 voices are taking a vote


Jerry VanOoteghem
Posts: 4154
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
First Name: Jerry
Last Name: Van
Location: S.E. Michigan

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by Jerry VanOoteghem » Mon Aug 25, 2025 12:46 pm

That brand & design of front springs/shocks were pointed out as a factor in the fatal crash of Ken Meek. My apologies for bringing this up.


Wayne Sheldon
Posts: 4282
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:13 pm
First Name: Wayne
Last Name: Sheldon
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Runabout 1913 Speedster
Location: Grass Valley California, USA
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by Wayne Sheldon » Tue Aug 26, 2025 6:48 am

Jerry VanOoteghem wrote:
Mon Aug 25, 2025 12:46 pm
That brand & design of front springs/shocks were pointed out as a factor in the fatal crash of Ken Meek. My apologies for bringing this up.
I do not like sabotaging people's for sale items. However, on these style shock absorbers, it is very important to keep reminding that the fronts of these should not be used on a T intended to be driven on modern roads and in modern traffic.
There are solid engineering reasons WHY these are unsafe on the front axle. I think they look great as wall hangers and discussion pieces (discussions should include the explanation that they should not be used today)
A pair of rear shock absorbers of this type (depending a bit on specific manufacturer?) in good condition should be okay for use today, and I think look fantastic on a brass era T!

So I am on your side Jerry V O!

Good luck with the sale! In spite of recent as well as long past histories.


Loftfield
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:26 pm
First Name: Thomas
Last Name: Loftfield
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1912 Touring, 1912 Express Pick-up
Location: Brevard, NC, USA

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by Loftfield » Tue Aug 26, 2025 7:03 am

Can we have at least a brief explanation of the design dangers?


Topic author
Karl Von Neumann
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:52 am
First Name: Karl
Last Name: VonNeumann
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 touring 1927 tudor 1926 hotrod 1913 speedster (project) 1926 coupe (project)
Location: Pleasant prairie Wisconsin
Board Member Since: 2022

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by Karl Von Neumann » Tue Aug 26, 2025 9:56 am

Loftfield wrote:
Tue Aug 26, 2025 7:03 am
Can we have at least a brief explanation of the design dangers?
As I understand ut age and lack of maintainence cause the springs the break. Letting the center part of the shock fall down cause the car to drastically change front end geometry and causing especially the front axle to buckle under. I think on a driver car these are stupid on a display or parade car they are a cool accessory.
Please hold the other 6 voices are taking a vote

User avatar

DanTreace
Posts: 3872
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
First Name: Dan
Last Name: Treace
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘12 open express,'23 cutoff, '27 touring
Location: North Central FL
Board Member Since: 2000
Contact:

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by DanTreace » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:12 am

Follow up to Jerry's comment on this brand of shock absorber, haven't been able to determine mfg.


These are pics I took of the subject shocks, during a presentation after investigation, as with any accident there were multiple contributing factors identified.

IMO the design of a two-piece front shock/perch is questionable, un-like any other commercial accessory Ford front shock absorber placed on the market.

The shaft of the perch is riveted between the upper yoke of the shock body, and with probable movement or toggle of the pieces, from torsion, over-stress could develop.


Two piece rivet perch.jpg
Two piece rivet perch.jpg (81.07 KiB) Viewed 63 times


In the accident, one perch shaft did part at the top of the axle.


fractured perch shaft.jpg
fractured perch shaft.jpg (74.33 KiB) Viewed 63 times
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford

User avatar

TRDxB2
Posts: 6329
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:56 pm
First Name: Frank
Last Name: Brandi
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Speedsters (1919 w 1926 upgrades), 1926 (Ricardo Head)
Location: Moline IL
Board Member Since: 2018

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by TRDxB2 » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:42 am

Loftfield wrote:
Tue Aug 26, 2025 7:03 am
Can we have at least a brief explanation of the design dangers?
These are
There isn't a brief explanation but some assumptions. The fact is that the one shock had its perch bolt snapped. No evidence if this caused the wheels to lock or it snapped as a result of the crash. The shock itself shows many issues from shackle wear
Lengthy discussion with facts, speculations & preferences. https://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/2 ... 99388.html
--
--
xxxxx.jpg
--
--
Untitled.png
Untitled.png (464.77 KiB) Viewed 43 times
The past is a great place and I don't want to erase it or to regret it, but I don't want to be its prisoner either.
Mick Jagger


Jerry VanOoteghem
Posts: 4154
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
First Name: Jerry
Last Name: Van
Location: S.E. Michigan

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by Jerry VanOoteghem » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:50 am

During one of these discussions, a member of this forum mentioned having an example of this same shock absorber. His example had previously been broken in a similar fashion and was welded back together.


Jerry VanOoteghem
Posts: 4154
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
First Name: Jerry
Last Name: Van
Location: S.E. Michigan

Re: FS accessory spring for early cars

Post by Jerry VanOoteghem » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:55 am

Wayne Sheldon wrote:
Tue Aug 26, 2025 6:48 am
Jerry VanOoteghem wrote:
Mon Aug 25, 2025 12:46 pm
That brand & design of front springs/shocks were pointed out as a factor in the fatal crash of Ken Meek. My apologies for bringing this up.
I do not like sabotaging people's for sale items. However, on these style shock absorbers, it is very important to keep reminding that the fronts of these should not be used on a T intended to be driven on modern roads and in modern traffic.
There are solid engineering reasons WHY these are unsafe on the front axle. I think they look great as wall hangers and discussion pieces (discussions should include the explanation that they should not be used today)
A pair of rear shock absorbers of this type (depending a bit on specific manufacturer?) in good condition should be okay for use today, and I think look fantastic on a brass era T!

So I am on your side Jerry V O!

Good luck with the sale! In spite of recent as well as long past histories.
Wayne,

I don't like it either and truly do feel bad about bringing it up. I was on the tour when Ken lost his life. I did not see the accident, but like all of us, felt extreme grief at the loss of one of our friends. Not ever wanting to revisit that, I felt compelled to mention this. Thank you for understanding. I hope that Karl understands as well.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic