Ford in Lilliput

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
User avatar

Topic author
Jem
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:37 pm
First Name: Jem
Last Name: Bowkett
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 Touring #9267
Location: Spalding United Kingdom
Board Member Since: 1999

Ford in Lilliput

Post by Jem » Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:00 pm

This is from our Club calendar for November. Seems to me that the huntsman and his lady friend are below 4ft height!
Attachments
IMG_20221031_140001386.jpg


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by TXGOAT2 » Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:04 pm

Well, they say that people were smaller then.... and of course, the Brits get no sun, thus no vitamin D, so perhaps they were smaller yet. I know one thing, whoever designed the interior ergonomics for the "improved" Ford roadster was either a midget or a sadist.


speedytinc
Posts: 4725
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
First Name: john
Last Name: karvaly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
Location: orange, ca
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by speedytinc » Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:10 pm

TXGOAT2 wrote:
Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:04 pm
Well, they say that people were smaller then.... and of course, the Brits get no sun, thus no vitamin D, so perhaps they were smaller yet. I know one thing, whoever designed the interior ergonomics for the "improved" Ford roadster was either a midget or a sadist.
Sadist. :lol:


Norman Kling
Posts: 4634
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 1:39 pm
First Name: Norman
Last Name: Kling
Location: Alpine California

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by Norman Kling » Wed Nov 09, 2022 12:48 pm

The problem with the "Improved" Ford was the same length chassis as the earlier cars but the new placement of the gas tank moved the knee room back toward the seat. So people with long legs had more problems. I can fit in it just fine, but I have a long torso and short legs.
Norm

User avatar

Mark Nunn
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:01 am
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Nunn
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Runabout
Location: Bennington, NE
Board Member Since: 2017

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by Mark Nunn » Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:20 pm

Two weeks ago, I took a 20-something guy for a drive in my '26 Runabout. He had never been around a Model T before. I explained during the drive that we can be friends when we leave but we will be close buddies when we get back. I told him that as we were bumping shoulders on the rough drive. Yes, it's tight.


Alan Long
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:33 am
First Name: Alan
Last Name: Long
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1910 Canadian Touring Car and 1926 Australian built Utility
Location: Western Australia

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by Alan Long » Wed Nov 09, 2022 6:31 pm

Talking about folks being shorter back in the Model T days but I’ve found this must have still been the case in the 1940’s
I’m very keen to buy a Ford Jeep from WW2 Days but there isn’t enough leg room to get into it!
The rear wheel arch continues into the vehicle directly behind the drivers seat and no way of changing it.
Boy oh boy, Sgt Saunders of Combat TV series must have been a shorty and not over 6 Foot like me
Alan In Western Australia

User avatar

Rich Eagle
Posts: 6895
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:51 am
First Name: Richard
Last Name: Eagle
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 TR 1914 TR 1915 Rd 1920 Spdstr 1922 Coupe 1925 Tudor
Location: Idaho Falls, ID

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by Rich Eagle » Thu Nov 10, 2022 2:14 pm

Being that the proportions of the car are relatively correct I would say the illustrator was competent enough. The smaller people give the illusion of the car being bigger and probably done as a selling point. I have been fortunate to fit a Model T very comfortably, but some consider me short.
When did I do that?

User avatar

DLodge
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2019 8:14 pm
First Name: Dick
Last Name: Lodge
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Touring
Location: St. Louis MO
Board Member Since: 1999

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by DLodge » Thu Nov 10, 2022 4:42 pm

I have rarely found any particular advantage to being shorter than many other men (I'm 5'7"), but I fit very comfortably in my Model T.

User avatar

Rich Eagle
Posts: 6895
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:51 am
First Name: Richard
Last Name: Eagle
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 TR 1914 TR 1915 Rd 1920 Spdstr 1922 Coupe 1925 Tudor
Location: Idaho Falls, ID

Re: Ford in Lilliput

Post by Rich Eagle » Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:14 pm

We are the last to know when it rains. :lol:
When did I do that?

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic